From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12051: 24.1; rcirc-send-message doesn't take multibyte into account. Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:50:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83d32rv9bn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87boj3byqy.fsf@acerpad.localdomain> <83k3x1jx3p.fsf@gnu.org> <874no4apau.fsf@acerpad.localdomain> <83628kkgjw.fsf@gnu.org> <831uj8jdl3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345085483 6017 80.91.229.3 (16 Aug 2012 02:51:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12051@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 16 04:51:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T1qB7-00087Q-DX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:51:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35321 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1qB6-0003il-5G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1qB3-0003iB-BR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:51:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1qB2-0006BC-Cd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1qB2-0006B8-97 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1qJW-0005Pd-Pa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12051 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12051-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12051.134508598120752 (code B ref 12051); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12051) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2012 02:59:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60056 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1qJ8-0005Ob-E1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:59:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:42004) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1qJ3-0005OQ-Og for 12051@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M8T00F00UD0S400@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12051@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:50:45 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M8T00FHOUKKJ4B0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:50:45 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63212 > From: Leo > Cc: 12051@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:00:39 +0800 > > On 2012-08-16 00:59 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Again, assuming the worst expansion is IMO much better, and will not > > force you to encode in a loop. But that's me. > > By worst expansion, do you mean assuming each char to be 5 bytes? Yes.