From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Setting TZ in set_time_zone_rule Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:08:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83d2yvv4o0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83624pwq8z.fsf@gnu.org> <50B67266.1000509@cs.ucla.edu> <50B6B886.9020309@cs.ucla.edu> <83zk21ul87.fsf@gnu.org> <50B7D60C.7070306@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354266554 16540 80.91.229.3 (30 Nov 2012 09:09:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, fabrice.popineau@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 30 10:09:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TeMb7-00047j-I3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:09:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38561 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeMaw-0000AF-3f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 04:09:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeMau-000098-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 04:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeMam-00045V-DU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 04:09:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:60438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeMam-00045I-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 04:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEA00G00MGMWF00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:09:02 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEA00GYDMR1XI00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:09:02 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <50B7D60C.7070306@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155137 > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:39:24 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: fabrice.popineau@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 11/28/12 19:44, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > So would it be a problem to use 'setenv' in that function? > > I think setenv could be used. It'd be a tiny bit tricky, though, > as I expect unsetenv would also need to be used, in some > cases. Is 'unsetenv's less wide-spread than 'setenv'?