From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rectangular regions Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:26:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83d2mjc49i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52707D17.6010801@dancol.org> <8338niefba.fsf@gnu.org> <87a9hq8h7p.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <838ux8d05z.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383334031 9511 80.91.229.3 (1 Nov 2013 19:27:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 20:27:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VcKNF-0001XJ-5w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:27:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39590 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcKNE-0001S1-Jc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcKN7-0001Qt-6z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcKN2-0004Yz-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:53836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcKN2-0004Yv-Eh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:27:00 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVL00A00N4XUA00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:26:59 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVL00AMQNCMMK80@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:26:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164826 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:35:25 -0400 > Cc: bzg@gnu.org, dancol@dancol.org, sdl.web@gmail.com, jay.finger@pobox.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > GUD could simply override the binding: I find it hard to believe a > > rectangular region could be useful in GUD buffers. > > GUD's binding is global (it's useless in the *gud* buffer, since it's > to be used at the location where you want to place a breakpoint). Then how about if GUD binds "C-x SPC" locally in buffers whose major mode inherits from prog-mode?