From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Progress report on git-blame (was: RFC - cleaning up /etc) Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:34:32 +0200 Message-ID: <83d2jgcy5z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20140109140226.57D6C38085A@snark.thyrsus.com> <20140110155121.GA8178@thyrsus.com> <20140111205925.GC17111@thyrsus.com> <87y52mdoha.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fvoceuos.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390635308 3352 80.91.229.3 (25 Jan 2014 07:35:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 25 08:35:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W6xlr-0001YX-7a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:35:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50183 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6xlq-0005NZ-EY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:35:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6xlg-00059Q-US for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6xla-0006ZC-Ri for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:35:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:50753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6xlP-0006YN-Gh; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:34:47 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZY002004XQFM00@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:34:03 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZY00MNL50RT840@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:34:03 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87fvoceuos.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169041 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:06:43 +0100 > > my current code (which is not ready for submission as it does not > support all options of git-blame yet) takes 2 seconds for the git-blame > step as opposed to the 40 seconds the system binary does. That's at > least encouraging and one can expect some of that to be pure output > time. Thank you for doing this.