From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16433: Test case for newline cache corruption Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:31:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83d2en5kl9.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401989607 562 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2014 17:33:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 17:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16433-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ken Olum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 05 19:33:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbXT-00027D-HV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:33:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42938 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbXT-0000JW-6F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:33:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42047) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbXK-000091-Eq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:33:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbXE-0005aQ-CM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:33:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbXE-0005aL-AK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbXE-0006Gh-0b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:33:04 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:33:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 16433 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Mail-Followup-To: 16433@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 16433-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D16433.140198953523958 (code D ref 16433); Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:33:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16433-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2014 17:32:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbWM-0006E9-Ni for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:32:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:51611) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbWG-0006DP-72 for 16433-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6P00300HNCNK00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 16433-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:28:52 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N6P001KRHW3L350@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:28:52 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90069 Archived-At: > From: Ken Olum > Cc: 16433@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:57:46 -0400 > > As far as I can tell, the fix is good. I've been running with it all > this week and I have not seen any cache corruption. As far as I'm > concerned the bug could be closed. Thanks a lot, closing. > Sorry about my confusion earlier about the different branches. No sweat, anybody could make a mistake.