From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unused/obsolete `last-code-conversion-error'? Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:54:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83d2blkh52.fsf@gnu.org> References: <53FDD86F.9060807@yandex.ru> <83sikij85u.fsf@gnu.org> <53FE059F.1020703@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409158472 21055 80.91.229.3 (27 Aug 2014 16:54:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 27 18:54:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XMgUL-00020V-8q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:54:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60596 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMgUK-0000vS-Vi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:54:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMgUA-0000o1-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:54:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMgU3-0004X1-49 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMgU2-0004Wu-SJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NAZ00I005HMSS00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:54:05 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NAZ00I9F5M5SE10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:54:05 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <53FE059F.1020703@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173850 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:21:51 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 08/27/2014 06:53 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > It is assigned values in coding.c, so "untouched" is inaccurate. > > I mean "last change around it is dated back to 2009". > > > Why is this an improvement? > > Because it is just another set-but-never-used variable. But your change still assigns values to variables, so I see no real difference.