From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: string> missing?
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 05:50:17 +0300
Message-ID: <83d21cqj9y.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org>
	<oirsia8iyl7.fsf@gmail.com> <83sia8rdkm.fsf@gnu.org>
	<oirr3psixh1.fsf@gmail.com> <83pp5crbfd.fsf@gnu.org>
	<oirpp5civmg.fsf@gmail.com> <83mw0gr4eh.fsf@gnu.org>
	<oiroakwio21.fsf@gmail.com> <jwvk2vkxwck.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433386262 10076 80.91.229.3 (4 Jun 2015 02:51:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 02:51:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org, nandryshak@gmail.com, tsdh@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 04 04:50:53 2015
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Z0LF4-0001g9-Bs
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 04:50:50 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39944 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Z0LF3-0001Qn-IO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:50:49 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51983)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Z0LEn-0001Qh-8n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:50:34 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Z0LEi-0002xE-VA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:50:33 -0400
Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:41487)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1Z0LEi-0002w6-NM; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:50:28 -0400
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NPE00G00FS0EJ00@mtaout28.012.net.il>;
	Thu, 04 Jun 2015 05:49:47 +0300 (IDT)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0NPE00ATBFUZNY50@mtaout28.012.net.il>;
	Thu, 04 Jun 2015 05:49:47 +0300 (IDT)
In-reply-to: <jwvk2vkxwck.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187009
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/187009>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:28:13 -0400
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, tsdh@gnu.org, nicolas@petton.fr,
> 	emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > Apply this same logic to string< and string>.
> 
> Emacs is inconsistent.  That's part of its inheritance.
> If someone wants to add string>, I'm perfectly OK with it.

Why not _remove_ string< and use compare-strings for both jobs?