From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21682: 25.0.50; display bug Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:14:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83d1we6bap.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83eggw84z3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445012134 20780 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2015 16:15:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, 21682@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 16 18:15:23 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn7ex-0005N2-3x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:15:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54806 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn7ew-0007tN-Ik for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41323) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn7et-0007sE-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn7ep-0001Uu-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34619) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn7ep-0001Uq-HX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn7eo-0008BV-Uc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:15:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21682.144501206731367 (code B ref 21682); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2015 16:14:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn7eE-00089p-Mc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:14:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:46854) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn7du-000892-9M for 21682@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:14:25 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NWB00900LWDAJ00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 21682@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:13:27 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NWB00OPBMEEHHA0@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:13:27 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:107686 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: schwab@suse.de, handa@gnu.org, 21682@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:58:47 -0400 > > > I thought asking Richard for dribble files in both cases, but if you > > already understand what's going on, there would be no need. > > I sent a very simple reproducible test case -- better than a dribble > file. I don't see the problem on fencepost accessed via PuTTY. > Did you mean a termscript file? Yes, sorry. But now that Andreas explained the problem, there's no need.