From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 05:33:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83d1qxentf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878u1um2xl.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87fuw090k7.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y49spuxt.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov4achc.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <83r3fkpb3u.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh5rps0t.fsf@gnu.org> <56E066BD.5050403@cs.ucla.edu> <83wpp9jt82.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov1dje9.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <83pov0j2c6.fsf@gnu.org> <87egbgeqpv.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <838u1oixx0.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn6keq1i.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <834mcciwju.fsf@gnu.org> <87io0sl6am.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <83k2l8gmsz.fsf@gnu.org> <87twkavytc.fsf@vostro.rath.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457926433 13126 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2016 03:33:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 03:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nikolaus Rath Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 14 04:33:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1afJGL-0006Kh-74 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 04:33:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afJGK-0005jn-98 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 23:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afJG7-0005jf-VH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 23:33:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afJG4-0007zf-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 23:33:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afJG4-0007zb-MW; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 23:33:28 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1404 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1afJG4-0000Vo-0g; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 23:33:28 -0400 In-reply-to: <87twkavytc.fsf@vostro.rath.org> (message from Nikolaus Rath on Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:43:27 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201671 Archived-At: > From: Nikolaus Rath > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:43:27 -0700 > > > I think you need "Reply-to: emacs-devel@gnu.org" as well. > > That's not a good idea, because it robs any reader of the choice of > sending a personal or public reply. > > See http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html for a more detailed discussion. The problems mentioned there don't exist in our case.