From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Differences between Org-Mode and Hyperbole Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 10:10:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83d1mwtt04.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9cdmj6t.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <5775A512.4020803@gmail.com> <8337ntvm2d.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9c9lqll.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467443483 17089 80.91.229.3 (2 Jul 2016 07:11:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 07:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 09:11:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bJF59-0005Fe-Qc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:11:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37221 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJF58-00018L-TJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 03:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJF4y-00014f-PE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 03:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJF4t-0007Ci-Mo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 03:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJF4t-0007Cd-JP; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 03:10:59 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2194 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bJF4j-0006BA-4I; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 03:10:50 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:09:35 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205076 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:09:35 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > If someone wanted features that Mail mode didn't have, > the best way to add them to Emacs would have been to add them to Mail mode. > The second best way to add them to Emacs, > in case they did not fit into Mail mode, > would have been to make an alternate mail-sending mode, > as an independent feature. As life would have it, we've already done this: Message mode, which came from Gnus, is now the default mail-composing mode in Emacs. > Being independent features doesn't mean they can't work together. > Rmail and Mail mode are both independent features, but they work > together through clean interfaces. Indeed, Rmail now by default invokes message.el when you compose the reply.