From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next Emacs RC tomorrow? Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:28:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83d1lghf5k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bn12q8as.fsf@petton.fr> <135b23c3-305e-3b2b-4f09-9be29cab2ed2@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470840029 23069 195.159.176.226 (10 Aug 2016 14:40:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 10 16:40:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUgA-0005oz-Vq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:40:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42029 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUg8-0003nT-1X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56425) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUUu-00044k-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUUq-0006uN-OA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:28:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUUq-0006uB-LC; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:28:40 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3730 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUUo-0005jN-8g; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:28:39 -0400 In-reply-to: <135b23c3-305e-3b2b-4f09-9be29cab2ed2@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:27:40 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206535 Archived-At: > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:27:40 +0300 > > On 08/09/2016 06:19 PM, Nicolas Petton wrote: > > > I plan to release the second RC tomorrow. I'm not aware of anything > > pending, but maybe I missed something and should wait a few more days? > > I think we should fix bug#24117 first. It's not marked as a blocker > (Eli?), but clearly seems to be one. I'd like to, but it doesn't sound like we have a consensus about the way to fix it. Would it work to make the buffer unibyte _after_ inserting the URL? Does anyone of those who objected to making it unibyte to begin with object to this proposal?