From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why does adding a useless copy-sequence and discarding the result make my ELisp 40 times faster? Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 20:26:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83d1d5b736.fsf@gnu.org> References: <77900613-3b45-52f4-5770-38fe6f27e69c@gmail.com> <83vaqxbzub.fsf@gnu.org> <8760ixhc9a.fsf@luca> <96d5bde3-fc20-750e-abc7-541b2abd2bd8@gmail.com> <8737e1fh1q.fsf@luca> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490462882 29182 195.159.176.226 (25 Mar 2017 17:28:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 17:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: politza@hochschule-trier.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 25 18:27:54 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1crpTk-0006dN-NA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 18:27:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38088 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crpTq-0004Be-Qh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crpTG-0004BL-K9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crpTD-0004wr-I0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:27:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crpTD-0004wb-Eg; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:27:19 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2103 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1crpT8-0003kN-Lg; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:27:19 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:02:36 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213346 Archived-At: > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Clément Pit-Claudel > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:02:36 -0400 > > Emacs' docs for process-send-string claims that messages larger than 500 bytes will be split. That's a lie, has been so for quite some time.