From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30182: Update Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 12:30:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83d11mbc1v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k1wdqc4q.fsf@gmail.com> <87efmj27d5.fsf@gmail.com> <83vafvqjbf.fsf@gnu.org> <87inbvxdz8.fsf@gmail.com> <5A65AB97.1030401@gmx.at> <87po62kk10.fsf@gmail.com> <831sih23rh.fsf@gnu.org> <5A663490.3050409@gmx.at> <87r2qh5lya.fsf@gmail.com> <5A6C37A7.2020309@gmx.at> <87r2qag5wp.fsf@gmail.com> <5A6D8947.5010207@gmx.at> <87d11t9ria.fsf@gmail.com> <5A6EF1A2.30904@gmx.at> <83lgggirzp.fsf@gnu.org> <5A702D36.6040302@gmx.at> <83po5rh3pu.fsf@gnu.org> <5A718CFA.2080408@gmx.at> <878tcdtpbk.fsf@gmail.com> <5A72DD44.3060104@gmx.at> <83lggceh9m.fsf@gnu.org> <87372jh41f.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <5A757B23.60607@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517653769 3136 195.159.176.226 (3 Feb 2018 10:29:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 10:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, m.sujith@gmail.com, 30182@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 03 11:29:24 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv4K-00085L-28 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 11:29:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38834 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv6L-0007ma-5n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:31:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49321) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv66-0007kp-PN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv65-0003oX-UW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv65-0003oO-R5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:31:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv65-0004B5-LI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30182 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30182-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30182.151765384416033 (code B ref 30182); Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30182) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2018 10:30:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54946 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv5n-0004AX-Vp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:30:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58272) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv5m-0004AL-3X for 30182@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:30:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv5g-0003at-Bq for 30182@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:30:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv5g-0003aa-7M; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:30:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4780 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ehv5e-00074g-Vd; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 05:30:35 -0500 In-reply-to: <5A757B23.60607@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:04:35 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142843 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:04:35 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: m.sujith@gmail.com, 30182@debbugs.gnu.org > > In either case, an average Lisp programmer will be completely lost > when trying to understand process_pending_signals and gobble_input and > their possible implications. But maybe it is undocumentable. Why would a Lisp programmer need to understand that? It's a C-level problem, and should be fixed on the C level.