From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#11732: Follow-up to bug#11732
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 21:50:58 +0300
Message-ID: <83d0w4jgq5.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87obohkxga.fsf@XAVIER-PC.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<CAECZVPAXjLje9ED6fp1hJa4OPbBLd9nVsNMPB4xZ9njuDamF0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<83y3f0p6n7.fsf@gnu.org> <5B35F120.9040807@gmx.at>
	<83fu16nepn.fsf@gnu.org>
	<5B373A21.9050407@gmx.at> <83d0w8mrvu.fsf@gnu.org>
	<5B377CB8.1030602@gmx.at>
	<837emgmmu2.fsf@gnu.org> <5B389847.6000204@gmx.at>
	<83sh53kp1j.fsf@gnu.org> <5B3B3407.3020300@gmx.at>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530643811 7144 195.159.176.226 (3 Jul 2018 18:50:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 18:50:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: 11732@debbugs.gnu.org, mhatta@gmail.com
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 03 20:50:07 2018
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1faQNL-0001jv-1i
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 20:50:07 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42166 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1faQPS-0005Ik-2r
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:52:18 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48090)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1faQPH-0005FA-2A
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:52:08 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1faQPC-0006Bd-BO
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:52:07 -0400
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37762)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1faQPC-0006BX-8R
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:52:02 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1faQPB-0006kv-T6
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:52:01 -0400
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 18:52:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.11732.B11732.153064389325934@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11732
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
Original-Received: via spool by 11732-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11732.153064389325934
	(code B ref 11732); Tue, 03 Jul 2018 18:52:01 +0000
Original-Received: (at 11732) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2018 18:51:33 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1faQOj-0006kE-6A
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:51:33 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56946)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1faQOg-0006k0-PG
	for 11732@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:51:31 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1faQOW-0005fv-VO
	for 11732@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:51:25 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53682)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1faQOW-0005fp-QH; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:51:20 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3268 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1faQOV-0005Gq-57; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:51:20 -0400
In-reply-to: <5B3B3407.3020300@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Tue,
	03 Jul 2018 10:29:59 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs"
	<bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:148159
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/148159>

> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 10:29:59 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> CC: mhatta@gmail.com, 11732@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> No further explanations needed, the problem is clearly visible here
> now.  Do you have any explanation why calling DefWindowProc when
> handling WM_IME_STARTCOMPOSITION causes this aberrant behavior and not
> any of the other cases where we call DefWindowProc?

None whatsoever.

Moreover, I sometimes see the same problem in my "normal" Emacs
session running 26.1 sources where this change was not done (but in
"emacs -Q" I cannot trigger the problem unless I make the change).

So I think it's not the proposed change that does it, it's something
we don't do entirely correctly that interacts badly with
focus-follows-mouse configuration.  Which is why I said that unless
you have ideas how to fix this, we should simply install the proposed
change, and deal with the dialog problems separately, perhaps using
the changes I tried and you fixed.