From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35967: [PATCH] avoid flyspell error if point is at bob Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 17:39:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83d0jk9oft.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h89e8g3a.fsf@gmail.com> <83pno1xmz1.fsf@gnu.org> <857e9sb48z.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="202264"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: alex.branham@gmail.com, 35967@debbugs.gnu.org To: npostavs@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 11 16:40:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hahxA-000qUt-R1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:40:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59736 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hahx9-0008Dq-M0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:40:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hahwR-0008AI-Qe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hahwQ-0001tx-Ou for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hahwQ-0001to-K8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hahwQ-0006br-ER for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35967 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35967-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35967.156026395625350 (code B ref 35967); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35967) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2019 14:39:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hahvf-0006an-UO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:39:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34381) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hahvd-0006ab-IB for 35967@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:39:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hahvT-0001EM-E1; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3587 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hahvS-00023V-NW; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:39:03 -0400 In-reply-to: <857e9sb48z.fsf@gmail.com> (npostavs@gmail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:160371 Archived-At: > From: npostavs@gmail.com > Cc: Alex Branham , 35967@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:12:12 -0400 > > it seems fairly easy to remember that bobp should treat a narrowed > buffer the same way that beginning-of-buffer will. Not for this old curmudgeon, evidently. > My only complaint about bobp is that it's abbreviated perhaps a little > too far, to the point of obscurity. As in, who is "bob" and why are we > asking about him? That question has a known answer: Bob's your uncle.