From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: set-frame-size should respect line-spacing!? Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:06:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83d0ezkay0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87blun57wt.fsf@kenko.localhost.com> <83o8ymo3cx.fsf@gnu.org> <877e5al9ny.fsf@kenko.localhost.com> <26dd3c24-f21d-bbef-a975-86318a8eaf80@gmx.at> <8336fynvq4.fsf@gnu.org> <1d1e1131-19ca-687c-8383-35a5fb8e3021@gmx.at> <83zhi6m7ls.fsf@gnu.org> <9b1761cd-5877-16b8-39a0-b68e20e4b0cb@gmx.at> <83pnj1ko44.fsf@gnu.org> <6b419874-269e-b15d-3bdf-ac68420b2197@gmx.at> <83imoslty4.fsf@gnu.org> <78f7d947-d17a-9d4a-8b8d-d07eed25c887@gmx.at> <83ftjwlr2q.fsf@gnu.org> <57de2a38-3b9e-4d44-c1a5-a2d1bd988292@gmx.at> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="14776"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: ingo.lohmar@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 14 10:07:31 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJvO6-0003iF-MH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:07:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45518 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJvO4-0003v5-Hi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:07:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJvNY-0003uv-Gr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:06:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJvNX-0001sf-Hp; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:06:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2070 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iJvNU-0001BM-5y; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:06:54 -0400 In-reply-to: <57de2a38-3b9e-4d44-c1a5-a2d1bd988292@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:06:52 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240999 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, ingo.lohmar@posteo.net > From: martin rudalics > Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:06:52 +0200 > > > I think the only case where the issues raised by bug#14825 should > > matter is when we decide whether a window is too small. E.g., what > > bad things will happen if we interpret window-min-height in terms of > > the default face's font set for the buffer shown (or to be shown) in > > the window? > > Such an interpretation would cut both ways. Think of people that use > 'line-spacing' for ages or have remapped the default face font to > something higher. They would be surprised that C-x 2 all of a sudden > complains that their window is "too small for splitting". I very much doubt that, since less than 4 lines in a window is hardly useful. > Also note that often the buffer to be shown in the new window, for > example via 'pop-to-buffer', is unknown to 'split-window'. In that case, let us behave as we do currently. > I'm not against a fix for Bug#14825. But doing it in a clean and > consistent way will be pretty hard. I'm not going to lament its not being solved; it was you who brought it into this discussion. I suggest to proceed with the original discussion disregarding that bug for now.