From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39082: Inconsolata v3.000 has too wide spacing Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 18:56:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83d0bo7gwn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83eew47kix.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="132799"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 39082@debbugs.gnu.org To: greselin.andrea@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 12 18:00:03 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgYC-0003n7-4b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 17:57:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40124 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgY5-0002oH-KG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:57:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgXw-0002o5-EC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:57:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgXu-00012C-DY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:57:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51887) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgXu-00011D-A9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgXu-0001mt-7Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 16:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39082 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39082-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39082.15788481716815 (code B ref 39082); Sun, 12 Jan 2020 16:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39082) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2020 16:56:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgX5-0001lr-3N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:56:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45343) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgX3-0001lf-M9 for 39082@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgWy-0005E1-Fl; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:56:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2074 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iqgWx-0000EF-Gt; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:56:04 -0500 In-reply-to: <83eew47kix.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 12 Jan 2020 17:37:58 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:174508 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 17:37:58 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 39082@debbugs.gnu.org > > Sadly, I have no idea how to go about investigating this problem > further, maybe someone else does? One idea is to look at the character glyph metric we get from the font here: if (it->what == IT_CHARACTER) { unsigned char2b; struct face *face = FACE_FROM_ID (it->f, it->face_id); struct font *font = face->font; struct font_metrics *pcm = NULL; int boff; /* Baseline offset. */ [...] if (get_char_glyph_code (it->char_to_display, font, &char2b)) { pcm = get_per_char_metric (font, &char2b); if (pcm->width == 0 && pcm->rbearing == 0 && pcm->lbearing == 0) pcm = NULL; } (this is from xdisp.c), and then find the culprit, probably pcm->width, and go back to where we get these values from the font back-end. I cannot myself do this, as I don't have access to a system where this problem happens.