From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ligatures (was: Unify the Platforms: Cairo+FreeType+Harfbuzz Everywhere (except TTY)) Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 17:22:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83d07080oj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200517124125.000013a4@web.de> <97C7EAB7-10AB-4702-ABC8-EB6C1C50ABDB@gnu.org> <20200517165953.000044d2@web.de> <83lflqblp0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftbybio3.fsf@gnu.org> <83zha69xs2.fsf@gnu.org> <83367x9qeq.fsf@gnu.org> <0ccae2a4-533b-d15c-2884-c2f00b067776@gmail.com> <59b018c9-9748-b84b-5768-a0a7a1b87871@ieee.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="64425"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Trevor Spiteri Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 19 16:24:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jb3A8-000Gcv-2E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 16:24:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54908 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb3A7-00088y-42 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb38J-0005ti-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:22:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51987) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb38J-00040R-98; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:22:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4575 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jb38A-0005SO-3B; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:22:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <59b018c9-9748-b84b-5768-a0a7a1b87871@ieee.org> (message from Trevor Spiteri on Tue, 19 May 2020 12:09:32 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250925 Archived-At: > From: Trevor Spiteri > Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 12:09:32 +0200 > > For what it's worth, LibreOffice does it differently. I think what it > does is place the cursor on the position it would be if any following > text was missing. So moving after the second f in ffi would move the > cursor to the same position as after ff if the i was missing. This is only possible if the metrics of a sole f and f inside the ligature are identical or sufficiently close. That is not generally true in ligatures, not even in Latin ligatures.