From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Confused by y-or-n-p
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 13:31:39 +0200
Message-ID: <83czyynmuc.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <834kkcr1eo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <43b24209-fa65-0e26-7cbd-f99175a7ffd8@gmx.at>
 <87wnx7j5is.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <95b662f2-2492-4cf2-a09d-66b38b283db5@gmx.at>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="14380"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 25 12:33:28 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kslLc-0003fP-5B
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 12:33:28 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60918 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kslLb-0000bf-6W
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:33:27 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57258)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1kslKV-0008Eg-Ng
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:32:20 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33534)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kslKT-0008KV-QE; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:32:17 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1495
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kslKC-0000Qj-Hs; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:32:02 -0500
In-Reply-To: <95b662f2-2492-4cf2-a09d-66b38b283db5@gmx.at> (message from
 martin rudalics on Fri, 25 Dec 2020 09:42:10 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261736
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/261736>

> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
>  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 09:42:10 +0100
> 
>  > Here is a possible way to make the minibuffer modal:
>  >
>  > (defun minibuffer-lock ()
>  >    (when (active-minibuffer-window)
>  >      (select-window (active-minibuffer-window))))
>  >
>  > (add-hook 'post-command-hook #'minibuffer-lock)
> 
> That's too harsh because it would affect all minibuffer interactions.

Not if done only by the relevant commands/functions, right?