From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46325: 27.1; C-d in an rmail summary does not work on the first message Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 16:29:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83czxepozj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ft2apsav.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3347"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46325-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 05 15:30:50 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l828H-0000nP-61 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 15:30:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l828G-00021s-7E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:30:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l827X-00020K-H1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l827X-0004Wn-9O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l827X-00016R-3m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:30:03 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 46325 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 46325@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, pot@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 46325-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D46325.16125353674167 (code D ref 46325); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46325-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2021 14:29:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43255 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l826w-000159-MH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l826u-00014x-HH for 46325-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:29:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l826m-00042z-5c; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:29:18 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1609 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l826k-00062p-UF; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:29:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= on Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:30:24 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199385 Archived-At: > From: Francesco Potortì > Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:30:24 +0100 > Cc: 46325@debbugs.gnu.org > > >But the main problem -- that C-d doesn't delete the current message -- > >is indeed a bug, which was introduced while trying to optimize > >deletion of many messages. Does the patch below fix the bug with > >deletion? > > I cannot reproduce the bug with the patch installed. Thanks, installed on the master branch.