From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current mode command discovery Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:01:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83czwy7hnz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9aubm96.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6s6bkrg.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtw6bkjo.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7qbjn2.fsf@gnu.org> <87eehi820x.fsf@gnus.org> <83v9at9xel.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnv8xlqa.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7o9g90.fsf@gnu.org> <87im6revhq.fsf@tcd.ie> <83im6r98qd.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0r7uade.fsf@gnus.org> <83eehf978r.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft1vu9hd.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7n95pf.fsf@gnu.org> <8735xvu7sx.fsf@gnus.org> <834kib94ha.fsf@gnu.org> <87sg5vspg5.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2fn74uc.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9arne31.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29129"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 17 18:10:47 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCQLe-0007V0-Ra for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:10:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48920 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCQLd-0000nG-NG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCQCE-0000Xj-UM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:01:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCQCD-0006pv-WC; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4988 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lCQC7-0005Qd-P7; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:01:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v9arne31.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:11:46 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265021 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:11:46 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> I'm not sure what you mean? What's a fait accompli here? > > > > The filtering. It's on master. > > It's the default value of a defcustom. I don't see what's so faited > about that accompli? It can be changed trivially at any time. Fair enough. So I went ahead and made such a change. > >> This thread was not about M-x until you made it be about M-x. The > >> default filtering in M-x was discussed in a different thread. > > > > I apologize for confusing threads, but it should have been clear that > > everything I say in the "wrong" thread was directly related to the > > discussions in the "right" thread. > > It was perhaps not strategically sound to introduce a thread about a new > subject (a new command) while discussing M-x somewhere else. I'll add a > disclaimer about not talking about M-x when discussing this new command, > then. TIA