From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 19:09:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83czu52md8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeel42oh.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 05 18:13:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leK9H-0008ID-2N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 18:13:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47514 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leK9F-0003xP-Sf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:13:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leK66-0008Ru-Gg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leK66-0003wz-86 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK66-0003rE-37 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 16:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48221 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 48221-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48221.162023099814818 (code B ref 48221); Wed, 05 May 2021 16:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 16:09:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK62-0003qw-GW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52576) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK60-0003qn-9z for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47787) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leK5v-0003rC-58; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:51 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3005 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1leK5u-0007cM-Fu; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 05 May 2021 15:46:02 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205722 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:46:02 +0000 > > > "native-compilation" is a handful... would it make sense to change that > > to "--with-native-compile" instead? (I don't really have an opinion > > here, though.) > > FWIW I've really no preference here, I was asked for > "--with-native-compilation", as long as we decide something it's all > good by me. I'm not sure it is worth our while to make small changes in this name, since I believe we will want to release Emacs 28.1 with that option being the default (if libgccjit is available).