From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-mode fontification feels random Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:39:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83czstbovd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83o8cge4lg.fsf@gnu.org> <62e438b5-d27f-1d3c-69c6-11fe29a76d74@dancol.org> <83fsxsdxhu.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmwudgw3.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0n2cjg5.fsf@gnu.org> <83im2lbqmv.fsf@gnu.org> <179f6e4fa40.2816.cc5b3318d7e9908e2c46732289705cb0@dancol.org> <83fsxpbpn9.fsf@gnu.org> <551be928-a6c7-7d09-05a5-e298c54c737b@dancol.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4194"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 10 19:45:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lrOkC-0000xp-B6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 19:45:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38560 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrOkB-00069N-9F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:45:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrOex-0008V7-57 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60954) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrOeu-0001k9-BD; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:40:00 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1319 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrOef-0002Fo-Sh; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:39:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <551be928-a6c7-7d09-05a5-e298c54c737b@dancol.org> (message from Daniel Colascione on Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:33:56 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270664 Archived-At: > Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org, > rudalics@gmx.at > From: Daniel Colascione > Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:33:56 -0700 > > >> Performance is reasonable most of the time. > > Not IME. > > Is it true that you run at -O0 and extra checking enabled? Sometimes, yes. But mostly, no. My long-term production sessions are usually a released Emacs compiled with the default options, which means -O2 and no --enable-checking. I do use --with-wide-int, but that incurs only a 30% slowdown.