From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49043: 27.1: ibuffer-toggle-filter-group [BUGFIX] Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:04:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83czsm2exu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210615155231.75wevy3wtzu4vx7l@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87k0mvrto4.fsf@gnus.org> <20210615201851.jwnjx23qptp3agp7@E15-2016.optimum.net> <878s3aql10.fsf@gnus.org> <20210616082601.zznhdrng76yseug3@E15-2016.optimum.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25518"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 49043@debbugs.gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 16 14:05:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltUI9-0006Qs-UD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:05:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42186 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltUI8-0001Rc-Vc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltUI2-0001RF-6h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltUI1-00048Z-V8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltUI1-0007VQ-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:05:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49043 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49043-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49043.162384509128831 (code B ref 49043); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49043) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2021 12:04:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51682 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltUHr-0007Ux-5l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:04:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltUHp-0007Uj-1t for 49043@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:04:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltUHj-0003tg-Fd; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:04:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3640 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltUHj-0003ml-3O; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:04:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210616082601.zznhdrng76yseug3@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:26:01 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208630 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:26:01 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: 49043@debbugs.gnu.org > > Another approach to consider would be to put bounds-checking in function > delete-region against (point-min) and (point-max). delete-region already does include such checking, that's why you get the backtrace: it signals an error.