From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: script-representative-chars for emoji Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 20:07:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83czok67ng.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lf38zvo5.fsf@gmail.com> <83mtno690b.fsf@gnu.org> <87czokzq3o.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38551"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 19:08:23 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXRRu-0009mo-G9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 19:08:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44014 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXRRt-0007cK-0K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 13:08:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36468) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXRQy-0006vy-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 13:07:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXRQy-0003ym-IE; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 13:07:24 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1725 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXRQy-00028m-4g; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 13:07:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87czokzq3o.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Mon, 04 Oct 2021 18:55:55 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276234 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 18:55:55 +0200 > > >> I added the following > >> > >> (emoji #x1F300 #x1F600 #xFE0F))) > >> > >> to script-representative-chars when creating the emoji script, but Iʼm > >> now wondering if that #xFE0F was a mistake, as there are fonts that > >> can represent emoji that won't have a glyph for VS-16. Iʼve not > >> noticed any negative effects so far, but perhaps we should remove it > >> in emacs-28? > > Eli> Didn't we add VS-16 to have sequences that begin with non-Emoji > Eli> character and end in VS-16 displayed in Emoji font, the change you did > Eli> in font_ranges? If you remove it, what happens to the likes of U+25AB > Eli> followed by U+FE0F ? > > We added it to the emoji script, but that doesnʼt mean it needs to be > in script-representative-chars. U+25AB U+FE0F is still composed > correctly and displays with the colourful emoji glyph if I remove it > from there. Then I'm okay with removing it.