From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51733: 27.1; Detect impossible email addresses better Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 18:44:03 +0200 Message-ID: <83czkry6jw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czn8etuz.7.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tugkkfid.fsf@gnus.org> <83fss44rbn.fsf@gnu.org> <875yt0ipre.fsf@gnus.org> <834k8k3za3.fsf@gnu.org> <874k8jfloo.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgqb18hq.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqb6tcm.fsf@gnus.org> <87tue3y96e.fsf@gnus.org> <83fspny8fp.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmory859.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee57y7xz.fsf@gnu.org> <87lezfy70y.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11287"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 16 17:45:18 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n98ec-0002me-3C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 17:45:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42104 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n98ea-0003sF-Ah for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 11:45:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n98eM-0003rp-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 11:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n98eM-0003RL-EU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 11:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n98eM-00022c-80; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 11:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 16:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 51733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51733.16423514637786 (code B ref 51733); Sun, 16 Jan 2022 16:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2022 16:44:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n98dj-00021V-6K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 11:44:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n98dh-00021J-AA for 51733@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 11:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=49864 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n98db-0003N5-NX; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 11:44:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=hz5M2mCMNrYOG/09IehkhlKKrkLvyaB9QjF46wwzrCw=; b=HK42xXJwqVHP GmM2sXR3AudnScYQFEpmTcLV/sZ86QnQRFeBuql/SRPTucCEDcD2QOTwz8t0e2JNaNy5DcIQXt1Kk BX8gZVHESn0nfaatJzyv7uSekdCWiD04+sEuwydtA5F9rLdC9kk4AXId7uEZ3EeV9XtFz5L8PvJPd 0BP5H0/lJ/xLIMaCGHDWg5/VU+xUznZkIVt6qsQHh2xTtEAN2sFlQd95xc6WXIF4t3fqR+iKvXNNi oNgQ/nMEjnva93Gn1PTU1/rVjB2Jld+5ml2i6h3r3RxedFMdeN8JAUT3rcrDUIEo7tT3oLIr9m6jB Zyc/TBOnNU1U6Vg7qZbymQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4358 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n98db-0005Kj-OV; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 11:44:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lezfy70y.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 16 Jan 2022 17:33:49 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224398 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org > Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 17:33:49 +0100 > > > Then what about text-security.el? or textsec.el? > > Yes, that'd work. Or... string-analysis.el? Is such an "analysis" useful for any other purposes than the one you want to use it? > With functions like `string-scripts' (lists the different scripts in > the string) That one should probably be elsewhere. Although even in that case, I don't really see how it could be useful for anything other than this particular purpose? I bet most Lisp programmers don't even know what is a "script" in the Emacs context.