From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suppressing native compilation (short and long term) Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 09:44:16 +0300 Message-ID: <83czbaafnj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bkqxf1ij.fsf@tethera.net> <8335c9dkyf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tu4odez7.fsf@gnu.org> <871qrrpkgx.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <834jwnbi6c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtafnun5.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <83sfk6ahty.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20739"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 02 08:45:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oesj7-0005Fa-5h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 08:45:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58188 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oesj6-0001Fl-94 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 02:45:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oesi9-0000OR-Jc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 02:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oesi9-0007bN-CG; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 02:44:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=j8Wbp7Dgb4rFOlFWfYzSaSgtgV4/TLRhbD7Ko02xmUg=; b=ClMbQHQRLV/8 qd5cVq1UTGp9NMD78ROPDmB9T8Ihe+jXjiKBxW0ua07uiGO/4+xNxpa3KzckEC4McBYylkENMWgCN BNU3D0nIENRsPTx3GVqmtLd6jpZSVq8P7ii7VCEHWOVDpsiGGnvFDUQSW6sDo+SEwSdDzBuCXvktG SFszXD25cbfF1hxY2gmDo0G94W7Z3a1P6BsDrBT5p38E8f8DhZXt7yG5U9/OTu6PNp9Jycghf1f+s njvanyNIAVS4xB5gy62ndsxrJalachTrKGWb5xtx7PisrZbi7QhZSOET40GEhQUZJoYVqmNe+Rn3W xppL1PzfhA++m1EjNwy0dg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2372 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oesi8-0001kD-S0; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 02:44:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: (tomas@tuxteam.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296585 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 08:10:15 +0200 > From: > > > I don't think you should try to second-guess the user who installs a > > package. They could just want to study the sources, for example. > > That's what apt-get source and friends are. The user can download, > build, modify, etc. the sources corresponding to packages. Those > are purely user operations, no admin powers needed. > > But installing a binary pacage on a system does modify the system > for all users, so admin powers do make sense there. What do you mean by "binary package" in this context? I believe "package" in this discussion generally alludes to Lisp packages, from ELPA and elsewhere. They aren't "binary" in my book.