From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>
Cc: 61274@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#61274: 29.0.60; dabbrev-capf signals errors
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 20:09:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83cz6pti8h.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8e01b85-1d3b-17b9-0b8a-e6aeccc38569@daniel-mendler.de> (message from Daniel Mendler on Sat, 4 Feb 2023 18:30:41 +0100)
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 18:30:41 +0100
> Cc: 61274@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>
>
> > Then there's something here that puzzles me: the recipe presented by
> > Daniel is basically identical to what dabbrev-completion does. And
> > yet dabbrev-completion produces different effects when invoked in the
> > same buffer with the same text at point. What is responsible for the
> > difference in behavior?
>
> You mean that the stringp type error does not occur? There is some code
> in `dabbrev-completion' which sets up Dabbrev (resets variables etc), so
> this is likely causing the difference.
This is solved by my patch.
I thought there was some difference in behavior even after that, but
it looks like I cannot reproduce it now, so I will consider that my
dream.
> However the second issue still occurs even with `dabbrev-completion'.
> When I execute `dabbrev-completion' in a buffer where no completions are
> found, I get the message "dabbrev--abbrev-at-point: No possible
> abbreviation preceding point", while the message should be the usual "No
> match" from `completion-at-point'.
I see a different message:
completion--some: No dynamic expansion for "x" found in this-buffer
Which IMO is completely reasonable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-04 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-04 11:03 bug#61274: 29.0.60; dabbrev-capf signals errors Daniel Mendler
2023-02-04 13:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-04 16:03 ` Daniel Mendler
2023-02-04 16:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-04 17:13 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-02-04 17:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-04 17:30 ` Daniel Mendler
2023-02-04 18:09 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-02-04 18:21 ` Daniel Mendler
2023-02-04 17:23 ` Daniel Mendler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83cz6pti8h.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=61274@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=mail@daniel-mendler.de \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.