From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:03:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83bpbglg8z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d3w2ncqs.fsf_-_@lola.goethe.zz> <87iq5py7xk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276337150 27521 80.91.229.12 (12 Jun 2010 10:05:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: James Cloos Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 12 12:05:48 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONNb2-0001B0-9j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:05:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34252 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONNb1-0005BP-EH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:05:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51586 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONNZ1-0003uM-V0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONNZ0-0005Zv-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:03:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:49932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONNZ0-0005Zn-56 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L3W00C00BT2F000@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:03:40 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.119.36]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L3W0074HBY3V1B0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:03:40 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125795 Archived-At: > From: James Cloos > Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:12:37 -0400 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , David Kastrup , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Oh, and my personal preference, as a l2r reader who occasionally deals > with r2l text, is for both C-f/C-b and LEFT/RIGHT to *always* move in > logical order. That's what Emacs does now. Both C-f/C-b and the arrows move in the logical order. There's no visual-order movement in Emacs (yet).