From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CMake build anyone? Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:01:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83bp9ub2ju.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87aapfxyhc.fsf@telefonica.net> <87wrsjwijl.fsf@telefonica.net> <83mxtfb7uo.fsf@gnu.org> <874ofnw8j4.fsf@telefonica.net> <83hbjnaqli.fsf@gnu.org> <87eieqvpym.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280163679 15225 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2010 17:01:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 26 19:01:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdR3F-0008HS-Es for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:01:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdR3E-0004cw-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40396 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdR39-0004cT-DZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdR38-0002a0-8J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:47094) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdR38-0002Zm-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:01:10 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L6600300CGE5000@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:01:09 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.61.30]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L660025OCLWGT30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:01:09 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87eieqvpym.fsf@telefonica.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127837 Archived-At: > From: =C3=93scar Fuentes > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:15:13 +0200 >=20 > >> For the time being, we can put MSDOS aside and go ahead if cmake= is seen > >> as convenient enough by the Windows maintainers. > > > > I think it's inconvenient even on GNU/Linux. >=20 > I'm not sure we are talking about the same here. The main convenien= ce of > cmake is for the Windows maintainers. If I can't convince you (Eli)= , > Jason and Juanma about its advantages, it is pointless to add it to > Emacs. I thought you were suggesting to use CMake in Emacs on all platforms. If not, I think it's a non-starter, since I doubt that the head maintainers will agree to add something like that just for the sake o= f the Windows build (and I won't blame them).