From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lisp/gnus/.dir-locals.el Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:18:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83bp814l5x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83aanyhrnz.fsf@gnu.org> <5n1v95koyt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837hiq5dh4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284398320 453 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2010 17:18:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 13 19:18:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvCfr-0001uA-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:18:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46461 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvCfq-0002Xv-KT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:18:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34660 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvCfg-0002Re-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvCfd-0006Xn-2e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:36434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvCfc-0006Xb-RA; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L8P008003Z6NW00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:18:19 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.81.53]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L8P008II42HDC40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:18:19 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130073 Archived-At: > Cc: Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:05:55 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> At least on Windows, bootstraping *does* compile lisp/gnus/.dir-locals.el. > > > > Because it uses the `recompile' target. > > It does? Sorry, that was my faulty memory. No, it doesn't. It compiles all the *.el files one by one, each one in a separate instance of Emacs. So Juanma's question is still valid: how does the Unix build avoid compiling gnus/.dir-locals.el?