Dired without ls?

Dired without ls?

[Deniz Dogan]

I've used Emacs on Windows for years now and only recently have I been
unable to use dired. I get the error that ls is not found.

Did I dream that ls is not required for dired? I'm almost 100 percent
sure I've used dired on Windows and I've never had ls installed.

-- 
Deniz Dogan

Re: Dired without ls?

[Stefan Monnier]

> Did I dream that ls is not required for dired? I'm almost 100 percent
> sure I've used dired on Windows and I've never had ls installed.

Indeed, it's not required.  The ls-lisp.el package included in Emacs
provides the necessary functions to let Dired works without ls.
AFAIK, this is used by default when running on Windows, tho it's
controlled by ls-lisp-use-insert-directory-program.


        Stefan

Re: Dired without ls?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:05:26 +0100
> 
> I've used Emacs on Windows for years now and only recently have I been
> unable to use dired. I get the error that ls is not found.
> 
> Did I dream that ls is not required for dired? I'm almost 100 percent
> sure I've used dired on Windows and I've never had ls installed.

No, you didn't dream.  Dired on Windows uses the Lisp emulation of ls,
in ls-lisp.el.

What does "C-h f insert-directory RET" say regarding where the
function is defined?  It should say that it's defined on ls-lisp.el,
if you are on Windows.

Re: Dired without ls?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:05:26 +0100
> 
> I've used Emacs on Windows for years now and only recently have I been
> unable to use dired. I get the error that ls is not found.

Is that in the development version of Emacs 24?  If so, I see that as
well, now.  Will investigate.

RE: Dired without ls?

[Drew Adams]

> I've used Emacs on Windows for years now and only recently have I been
> unable to use dired. I get the error that ls is not found.
> 
> Did I dream that ls is not required for dired? I'm almost 100 percent
> sure I've used dired on Windows and I've never had ls installed.

`ls' is not required for Dired on Windows.
On Windows, Dired uses `ls-lisp.el'.

Did you try with `emacs -Q'?  If so, and you see a problem, then please use `M-x
send-emacs-bug-report'.  If it works with `emacs -Q' but not otherwise, then
binary-search your init file to see where the problem lies.

Re: Dired without ls?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:05:26 +0100
> 
> I've used Emacs on Windows for years now and only recently have I been
> unable to use dired. I get the error that ls is not found.

There was a bug in dired.el on the development trunk.  I think I fixed
it, so please try again with the latest repository.

Re: Dired without ls?

[Deniz Dogan]

2011/2/2 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>> From: Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:05:26 +0100
>>
>> I've used Emacs on Windows for years now and only recently have I been
>> unable to use dired. I get the error that ls is not found.
>>
>> Did I dream that ls is not required for dired? I'm almost 100 percent
>> sure I've used dired on Windows and I've never had ls installed.
>
> No, you didn't dream.  Dired on Windows uses the Lisp emulation of ls,
> in ls-lisp.el.
>
> What does "C-h f insert-directory RET" say regarding where the
> function is defined?  It should say that it's defined on ls-lisp.el,
> if you are on Windows.
>

insert-directory is a compiled Lisp function in `ls-lisp.el'.

I tried with -Q and everything and couldn't get it to work. I filed a
bug report on it, but later found that it has already been reported in
#7869. Somebody should probably merge those two once my report comes
in.

-- 
Deniz Dogan

Re: Dired without ls?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:47:36 +0100
> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> 
> I tried with -Q and everything and couldn't get it to work. I filed a
> bug report on it, but later found that it has already been reported in
> #7869. Somebody should probably merge those two once my report comes
> in.

Merge, and then close, because I just fixed it ;-)

Will do.  Thanks for reporting this bug, it looks like it's been there
for at least a month.

Re: Dired without ls?

[Deniz Dogan]

2011/2/2 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>> From: Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:05:26 +0100
>>
>> I've used Emacs on Windows for years now and only recently have I been
>> unable to use dired. I get the error that ls is not found.
>
> There was a bug in dired.el on the development trunk.  I think I fixed
> it, so please try again with the latest repository.
>
>

It works! Thanks.

-- 
Deniz Dogan

Re: Dired without ls?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:52:02 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> > From: Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:47:36 +0100
> > Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> > 
> > I tried with -Q and everything and couldn't get it to work. I filed a
> > bug report on it, but later found that it has already been reported in
> > #7869. Somebody should probably merge those two once my report comes
> > in.
> 
> Merge, and then close, because I just fixed it ;-)
> 
> Will do.

Done.