From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11351: 24.1.50; marker does not point anywhere Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:04:26 +0300 Message-ID: <83bomeiinp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lilisjsu.fsf@gnu.org> <83ipgmioyr.fsf@gnu.org> <87397qh5mk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335456315 19740 80.91.229.3 (26 Apr 2012 16:05:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11351@debbugs.gnu.org To: sds@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 26 18:05:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SNRBx-0003y7-QV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:05:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50071 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNRBx-0004PK-5W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNRBo-0004L3-QL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNRBm-0007EQ-Rj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNRBm-0007EA-OI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SNRCj-00048V-IX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11351 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11351-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11351.133545633515862 (code B ref 11351); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11351) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2012 16:05:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54452 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SNRCJ-00047n-Bt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:35117) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SNRCG-00047Z-UZ for 11351@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:05:34 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3300900GKFWV00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 11351@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:04:24 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.249.186]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M33009FIGNBSEB0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:04:24 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87397qh5mk.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59525 Archived-At: > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 11351@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:31:15 -0400 > > > Do you have any guesses as to what that overlay might be? > > no, but if you tell me what C variable to examine (and how), I will > gladly do that when this happens again. Start by seeing if this is reproducible in an unoptimized build, otherwise the backtrace and the values of variables are untrustworthy. But it looks like this bug is a consequence of fixing another one, #9642, see the latest report by Tassilo Horn there.