From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: is undefined Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:47:22 +0200 Message-ID: <83bnww3lr9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8761n5z54q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87y501xoj1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <532EA750.5060903@dancol.org> <874n2pl0uv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83eh1s3nab.fsf@gnu.org> <87vbv4yjes.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395593277 1118 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2014 16:47:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 23 17:48:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRlZ7-0002eI-8w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:48:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRlZ6-0007UR-Pj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRlYz-0007TE-8V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRlYu-0006Pk-7o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:47:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:32855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRlYo-0006Cy-JO; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:47:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2W00300EMOSD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:47:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2W003H2ENAL030@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:47:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87vbv4yjes.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170877 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Cc: dancol@dancol.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:22:19 +0100 > > > I suggest to add this (and other) solutions to etc/PROBLEMS. > > >From my point of view, it would currently make more sense cherry-picking > the fixes of Daniel to the release branch unless we get reports that > they don't do the trick in cases where nulling XMODIFIERS does. Maybe I'm confused, but didn't Werner already provide such a report?