From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17702: 24.3; insert-char no longer inserts "bell" control character Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:35:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83bnu75kfq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21392.31505.332595.525782@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <83oay75qhu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401989787 2835 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2014 17:36:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 17:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ulm@gentoo.org, 17702@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 05 19:36:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbaM-0003zw-GC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:36:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42958 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbaM-0002n9-2r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbaC-0002ev-SB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:36:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsba7-0006nn-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsba6-0006ng-T2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsba6-0006NR-Bx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17702 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17702-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17702.140198973224454 (code B ref 17702); Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2014 17:35:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46035 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbZX-0006MC-Rf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:35:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:39682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WsbZS-0006Lp-V6 for 17702@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:35:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6P00F00HY6FY00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 17702@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:31:51 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N6P00FDZI13D300@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:31:51 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90070 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Ulrich Mueller , 17702@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:05:55 -0400 > > > That's because U+1F541 has "BELL" as its 'name' property, whereas > > u+0007 has "BELL" as its 'old-name' property. Emacs completion picks > > only one from these 2 duplicate candidates. > > It's not just a question of completion: u+0007 does not seem to have > a "name", and U+1F541 does not seem to have an "old-name", so the only > thing we don't have much to disambiguate the two, and given the "old-" > prefix, we prefer the char whose "name" matches. Where in the code do we prefer 'name' to 'old-name'? Perhaps we shouldn't. (I thought we treated them equally.)