From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16637: 24.3.50; menubar height is wrong Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:09:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83bnquebfa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5400B1F7.3050906@gmx.at> <83d2baedn1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409904625 6249 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2014 08:10:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16637@debbugs.gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 10:10:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPob1-0007I7-7w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:10:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56023 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPob0-0002NJ-NQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPoat-0002Kb-9q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPoao-0001fd-E0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPoao-0001fK-BF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPoan-0003rp-O6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16637 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16637-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16637.140990456414814 (code B ref 16637); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16637) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2014 08:09:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59242 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPoaB-0003qr-JK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:09:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:51518) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPoa8-0003qU-7k for 16637@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NBF00K00500KL00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16637@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:09:13 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NBF00KTW5BDEZ20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:09:13 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93060 Archived-At: > From: Fabrice Popineau > Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:33:36 +0200 > Cc: Martin Rudalics , 16637 <16637@debbugs.gnu.org> > > I have a full screen frame. I switch between laptop screen only and > external screen only using Windows key + P. > The whole frame is redisplayed AFAICS. If it's redisplayed once, that's expected. But if it's being redisplayed with no visible changes time after time, that's a bug. > I tried a frame with one window buffer and a frame with 3 windows buffers. > I have the feeling that it flickers more when there are more buffers > displayed in the same frame. > Albeit no definitive proof of it. > I'll let you know if I have some reasonable clue about where to look. Better file a separate bug with all the details. Thanks.