From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Your commit 7409a79 Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:28:59 +0200 Message-ID: <83bnnexafo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h9x917il.fsf@gnu.org> <85k324h0hg.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83k324yv44.fsf@gnu.org> <85tx17dqzy.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83y4qixhq8.fsf@gnu.org> <83egsaxbwy.fsf@gnu.org> <5485EA7A.1010705@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418063381 18023 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2014 18:29:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 08 19:29:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy33t-0007H8-LZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:29:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35436 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy33t-0008Ld-8M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:29:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy33a-0008LN-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:29:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy33V-00032K-KD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:29:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:46667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy33V-00032D-Cq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:29:09 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NGA00L000EODR00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:29:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NGA00L1Y0OJ8840@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:29:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5485EA7A.1010705@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179439 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:14:18 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 12/08/2014 09:57 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > My comment above was in the context > > of a request to use full sentences as summary lines. Is that a > > "failure to practice git subject line hygiene"? > Yes, absolutely. The typical Git style has no period at the end. I already agreed to no-period format. It can still be a full sentence. > We might also prefer to shorten the summary lines to 50 characters, > as that is is also part of the usual Git style. If someone can write a meaningful summary in 50 characters every time, chapeau. IMO, it is more important for the summary to be informative than it is to be short.