From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15322: VC log buffer scrolls itself Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 19:32:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83bni1tyf3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <861tiy5oa2.fsf@yandex.ru> <83h9rtu3vk.fsf@gnu.org> <554645AB.5080308@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430670800 2437 80.91.229.3 (3 May 2015 16:33:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 16:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, 15322@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 03 18:33:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YowpK-0003OW-2u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 18:33:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59760 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YowpJ-0000mV-Bw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 12:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YowpF-0000mO-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 12:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YowpC-0000Xf-Kf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 12:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YowpC-0000XQ-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 12:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YowpC-0005zp-C1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 12:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 16:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15322 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15322-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15322.143067072922985 (code B ref 15322); Sun, 03 May 2015 16:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15322) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2015 16:32:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YowoK-0005ye-FB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 12:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:35099) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YowoI-0005y9-1F for 15322@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 12:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NNS00M008FBXU00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 15322@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 19:31:59 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NNS00M7P8LBV090@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 03 May 2015 19:31:59 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <554645AB.5080308@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:102405 Archived-At: > Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, 15322@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 18:58:35 +0300 > > On 05/03/2015 05:34 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I don't think it's a good idea to have in the code comments that only > > mention the bug number, without also trying to explain the reason(s) > > for what the code does. > > Okay. That exact piece of code should be self-evident, but I've added > some words else where, as well as the bug reference anyway. Thanks. > > If it's possible to write a clear and concise> explanation, you don't > even need to mention the bug number. > > The surrounding code is pretty hairy, so might be possible to regress by > accident. This way, someone changing it would look at the bug first. Quite.