From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "concurrency" branch updated Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:51:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83bnb9trn0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1B30AC54-4A83-4437-8BA8-B80F4ED6AF1A@raeburn.org> <831tc7vyex.fsf@gnu.org> <83vb9hu612.fsf@gnu.org> <11F7A3CD-5203-42C9-93EF-842A1D4F9EEB@raeburn.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446670320 309 80.91.229.3 (4 Nov 2015 20:52:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: johnw@newartisans.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 04 21:51:51 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu526-0006n7-Cw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 21:51:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57101 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu525-0006AZ-Nc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:51:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41495) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu522-0006AR-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:51:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu51z-0006Kd-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:51:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:58913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu51y-0006KO-UE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:51:43 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXB00E005P09S00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:47:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXB009IF5Q9OB40@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:47:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <11F7A3CD-5203-42C9-93EF-842A1D4F9EEB@raeburn.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193236 Archived-At: > From: Ken Raeburn > Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:48:12 -0500 > Cc: johnw@newartisans.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > >> I suspect TLS is probably the more interesting case. > >=20 > > What do we have in TLS that we don't have in any network connecti= on? >=20 > Encryption, optional compression, possibly key renegotiation, possi= ble receipt of incomplete messages that can=E2=80=99t yet be decrypte= d and thus can=E2=80=99t give us any new data bytes. Doesn't all that become insignificant compared to network latencies?