From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 2b316c0: ; * CONTRIBUTE: Add section about the bug tracker Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:49:24 +0200 Message-ID: <83bnb7sbiz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151106085750.28172.54745@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446803452 24872 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2015 09:50:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 06 10:50:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZudfM-0005BF-9c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:50:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37647 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZudfL-0007Lq-Li for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:50:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49541) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zudex-0007LU-4w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zudet-0003Fx-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:58245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zudet-0003F3-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXD00F00ZVIPU00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:44:51 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXE00E6Y0ER8Z30@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:44:51 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193383 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:33:48 +0100 > > Speaking of admin/notes/repo... It has a few obsolete references to Bazaar, and > a comment "[The section on git merge procedure has not yet been written.]" Clean up is welcome. > And I miss some discussion about policies on pushing branches to the repo. > old-branches/* and other-branches/* are ancient, but what about the others? > Some are prefixed with scratch/ or fix/ (one case), while others are not (like > nsm, stream or shr-fontified). Is there any rhyme or reason? The convention was to use scratch/ for experimental branches and fix/ for public feature branches that fix some issue. Suggestions to codify this are welcome. > Also, perhaps some of the non-prefixed branches are really ancient, > like pending, and should be renamed? No idea, but I think this was already examined at some point, and what you see is the result. Thanks.