Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 2b316c0: ; * CONTRIBUTE: Add section about the bug tracker

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:33:48 +0100
> 
> Speaking of admin/notes/repo... It has a few obsolete references to Bazaar, and
> a comment "[The section on git merge procedure has not yet been written.]"

Clean up is welcome.

> And I miss some discussion about policies on pushing branches to the repo.
> old-branches/* and other-branches/* are ancient, but what about the others?
> Some are prefixed with scratch/ or fix/ (one case), while others are not (like
> nsm, stream or shr-fontified). Is there any rhyme or reason?

The convention was to use scratch/ for experimental branches and fix/
for public feature branches that fix some issue.  Suggestions to
codify this are welcome.

> Also, perhaps some of the non-prefixed branches are really ancient,
> like pending, and should be renamed?

No idea, but I think this was already examined at some point, and what
you see is the result.

Thanks.