From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we not introduce frivolous indentation change to define-minor-mode? Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 18:09:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83bn8x2wxt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d1tg57p6.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuybqdby.fsf@gmail.com> <87lh82vq6t.fsf@gmail.com> <87d1tevmjb.fsf@gmail.com> <87io36k9be.fsf@bernoul.li> <8737uavhcu.fsf@gmail.com> <568D389D.60401@yandex.ru> <87si2au25w.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452183002 25204 80.91.229.3 (7 Jan 2016 16:10:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, dgutov@yandex.ru, ohwoeowho@gmail.com, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Liu , John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 17:09:47 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD8D-0005FC-LC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:09:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59286 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD8D-0007wv-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:09:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD89-0007wp-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:09:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD88-0003Xs-Dq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:09:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD7r-0003VZ-QX; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:09:23 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1682 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD7q-0007V0-SC; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:09:23 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Leo Liu on Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:54:09 +0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197735 Archived-At: > From: Leo Liu > Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:54:09 +0800 > Cc: Jonas Bernoulli , emacs-devel , > Artur Malabarba , > Dmitry Gutov > > On the matter at hand I have reverted the change. If you insist on it > please discuss with Emacs devels. For now staying consistent with older > emacsen weighs more. I'm sorry, but the practice of unilaterally reverting commits of others seems unkind to me. I think we should refrain from making changes which are under dispute, where the parties have not yet reached an agreement. Doing so causes aggravation and animosity we'd better without. John, WDYT?