From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Processed: Re: bug#19717: 24.4.50; printing.el still uses ps-eval-switch Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:25:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83bn3v4bcj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83oa7x5wpc.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2ik68h2.fsf@gnu.org> <83bn3w675o.fsf@gnu.org> <834m9o659c.fsf@gnu.org> <83fut74fbu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464110788 2027 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2016 17:26:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 17:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 24 19:26:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b5G60-0005tN-7C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 19:26:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5G5z-0007Ni-Ci for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45508) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5G5U-0007ML-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:25:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5G5P-0001Uf-53 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:25:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5G5O-0001UP-PO; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:25:42 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4623 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b5G5K-0007jz-8a; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:25:39 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Tue, 24 May 2016 09:47:35 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203980 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:47:35 -0700 > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 05/24/2016 08:59 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I have hard time believing this is a browser issue > > I don't. There are different kinds of refreshes, and it's possible that > a partial refresh won't give you a new page at the same time that a full > refresh would. That makes no sense at all. It's the same browser and the same Web page. How can the browser know to refresh it in one case, but not in the other?