bug#24682: 26.0.50; Bootstrap failed

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
> Cc: 24682@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:33:53 +0200
> 
> > Isn't the value of __len (about 1.4GB) too large?  unexelf.c:406 is
> > this:
> >
> >   /* Copy over what we have in memory now for the bss area. */
> >   memcpy (new_base + new_data2_offset, (caddr_t) old_bss_addr,
> > 	  bss_size_growth);
> >
> > So bss_size_growth is about 1.4GB, which sounds incredibly large.
> >
> > the value is computed on line 334, can you tell the values of the two
> > variables that get subtracted there?
> 
> The values of local variables are (taken from *locals of temacs*)
> 
> int          new_file          6
> int          old_file          5
> off_t        new_file_size     1487902352
> caddr_t      old_base          0x7fffe8193000 "\177ELF\002\001\001"
> caddr_t      new_base          0x7fff8f699000 "\177ELF\002\001\001"
> Elf64_Ehdr * old_file_h        0x7fffe8193000
> Elf64_Ehdr * new_file_h        0x7fff8f699000
> Elf64_Phdr * old_program_h     0x7fffe8193040
> Elf64_Phdr * new_program_h     <optimized out>
> Elf64_Shdr * old_section_h     0x7fffe96aaff0
> Elf64_Shdr * new_section_h     0x7fffe8191b90
> char *       old_section_names 0x7fffe96aae5f ""
> char *       new_section_names <optimized out>
> Elf64_Phdr * old_bss_seg       <optimized out>
> Elf64_Phdr * new_bss_seg       0x7fff8f6990e8
> Elf64_Addr   old_bss_addr      7869540
> Elf64_Addr   new_bss_addr      93825034231808
> Elf64_Word   old_bss_size      <optimized out>
> Elf64_Word   bss_size_growth   1465781148
> Elf64_Word   new_data2_size    1465781152
> Elf64_Off    old_bss_offset    5772388
> Elf64_Off    new_data2_offset  5772388
> ptrdiff_t    n                 <optimized out>
> ptrdiff_t    old_bss_index     31
> struct stat  stat_buf          <complex data type>
> off_t        old_file_size     22121200

Thanks, this looks like something ELF experts should look into.