From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:17:29 +0300 Message-ID: <83bmya5i7q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eg51ng4r.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <87k2djwumn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> <83shrnm0k1.fsf@gnu.org> <83insi5jy9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477293539 11323 195.159.176.226 (24 Oct 2016 07:18:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 09:18:46 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byZWt-00017N-3R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:18:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45030 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byZWu-0008DD-9I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 03:18:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41029) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byZVn-0007vt-V3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 03:17:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byZVk-0000qM-1J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 03:17:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byZVj-0000qH-UY; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 03:17:31 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1369 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1byZVj-0003gL-4m; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 03:17:31 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:47:39 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208660 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:47:39 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> If I re-add international/characters it goes up a bit to > >> 0.96s, but still nowhere near the 3s I got on my big .elc file. > >> [ I wonder what makes loading my big file so slow. ] > >> > >> This said, there's still a factor 5-10 to get to "immediate", tho. > > > > A small price to pay for the advantages, IMO. > > I think a one second startup time for "emacs -Q -nw" on a fast machine > sounds pretty horrific, myself. We are not talking about 1 sec, we are talking about less than half that time, potentially even 1/4th of a second.