From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 17:33:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83bmixqshs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <50da4282-fb9c-6de8-b054-73038a8ea338@cs.ucla.edu> <8B999815-EA73-4B86-8588-889E1F855A56@gnu.org> <833755ar44.fsf@gnu.org> <83k1yb65mk.fsf@gnu.org> <838tel1hun.fsf@gnu.org> <837eu51gwa.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513524687 5624 195.159.176.226 (17 Dec 2017 15:31:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 15:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jim Meyering Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 17 16:31:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eQauQ-00014R-K2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 16:31:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54630 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQawO-0004hG-TS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:33:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33401) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQawI-0004h8-8m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:33:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQawE-0001yE-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:33:18 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQawE-0001yA-Ln; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:33:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4321 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eQawE-0005FW-01; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:33:14 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Jim Meyering on Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:34:08 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221172 Archived-At: > From: Jim Meyering > Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:34:08 -0800 > Cc: Glenn Morris , Paul Eggert , emacs-devel > > >> > My intention, unless I hear objections, is to resurrect the removed > >> > feature on the emacs-26 branch, but add an annoying warning there, so > >> > that any packages and maintainers who didn't notice the deprecation > >> > will do so sooner rather than later. But the feature will remain > >> > removed on the master branch, which will eventually become Emacs 27. > >> > >> I see Glenn already did that (thanks!). > > > > Jim, can you double-check that the original Automake's "make > > distcheck" works with the current emacs-26 branch? TIA. > > Hi Eli, > > I built emacs-26, made it first in my path, then confirmed that > Makefiles generated by stock fedora-27 automake > (automake-1.15.1-2.fc27) work with "make distcheck" on an > .el-distributing package (idutils). Great, thanks for testing. So I guess this issue can be closed now.