From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33870: 27.0.50; xref-goto-xref not configurable Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 05:37:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83bm3twnhq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a7ktqqx7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878t02egph.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874lak9kr0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zhscklhq.fsf@gmail.com> <87bm4qel4t.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <67c9abb5-f546-361f-04ca-da96ceaca4e2@yandex.ru> <87bm4le0tm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87imys6x5s.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87d0osjtna.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8ffaaddb-1d19-b9e9-83f1-83da89445eb8@yandex.ru> <87munmosx4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <77b96dc5-a994-de78-64bb-40ba7625d40f@yandex.ru> <838sz0yni3.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7jd7v1g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="188869"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 33870@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net, dgutov@yandex.ru To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 03 04:39:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8cj-000n01-6S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 04:39:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50847 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8ci-00032G-3S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8cZ-00032A-96 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:39:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8cY-00035N-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8cY-00035D-FS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8cY-00015a-Bj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 03:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33870 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 33870-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33870.15491650994123 (code B ref 33870); Sun, 03 Feb 2019 03:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2019 03:38:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8br-00014R-EA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:38:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43629) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8bp-00014A-5A for 33870@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:38:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8bj-0002SS-Bm; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:38:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4661 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gq8bi-0001ah-Rk; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:38:11 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= on Sat, 2 Feb 2019 22:22:05 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155043 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 22:22:05 +0000 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov , 33870@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 9:18 PM Juri Linkov wrote: > > > > > Fortunately, the whole point of this bug report opened by Juri is to make > > > this configurable. Later, we can decide on a better default, something Juri > > > is also very much in favor of. > > > > With a better default such problems wouldn't happen if definitions were > > displayed in a new split window taking space from the original window. > > It's only a "problem" in your opinion :-) I was assuming Eli also thinks it's > a bad default, but he hasn't confirmed this yet (and like Dmitry perhaps > we was misunderstanding the reason for the behaviour). And neither has he > said that your proposal is better. I thought I did express my opinions, but maybe I'm confused wrt the question(s) you are asking. Care to repeat them, for my benefit?