From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 21:30:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83bm04anyk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190502214006.4fdsinp7u5xuqvdv@Ergus> <20190503004416.xfuzzucflp6bxpuz@Ergus> <8736lm30lz.fsf@web.de> <864l61j04d.fsf@zoho.eu> <20190511073254.GB29829@tuxteam.de> <04187AB9-AD7D-492D-A890-BCB01848370C@icloud.com> <20190511075712.GD29829@tuxteam.de> <86a7fsfv1m.fsf@zoho.eu> <20190512075448.GA11650@tuxteam.de> <346107E9-590D-4A18-9152-ECFF36FC4EDC@icloud.com> <83r293bvok.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef53vihw.fsf@telefonica.net> <83mujrbsk7.fsf@gnu.org> <867eavywh1.fsf@zoho.eu> <837eaubesw.fsf@gnu.org> <86lfzawgb2.fsf@zoho.eu> <83y33a9y10.fsf@gnu.org> <868sv9w8t4.fsf@zoho.eu> <83ef519fdb.fsf@gnu.org> <86a7fpufu6.fsf@zoho.eu> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="171249"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 14 20:30:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQcCJ-000iQu-HO for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 20:30:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52341 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQcCI-0005wP-G0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:30:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQcC7-0005uV-47 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:30:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQcC7-0003xR-18 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:30:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3134 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hQcC4-0002AD-Da for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:30:29 -0400 In-reply-to: <86a7fpufu6.fsf@zoho.eu> (message from Emanuel Berg on Tue, 14 May 2019 19:05:21 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120372 Archived-At: > From: Emanuel Berg > Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 19:05:21 +0200 > > So how large should a project be before Emacs > becomes insufficient? It depends on the language, and I don't really know where to draw the line. On my daytime job I deal with C++ projects that have a few million lines of code, and Emacs OOB is only borderline useful there.