From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 7362554: Widen around c-font-lock-fontify-region. This fixes bug #38049. Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:29:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83blte5y61.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20191109144026.20810.76129@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20191109144027.DDC3720927@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <38328d99-23c8-7ba7-a23d-e70ac0aab67a@yandex.ru> <20191111203445.GA5135@ACM> <7497e71d-bab6-fa04-bbc4-f52fadeda16d@yandex.ru> <20191113211936.GB4942@ACM> <6fc930a1-eb47-9e54-8752-8cf7ff041586@yandex.ru> <81e61ed6-27a3-dbdd-34fa-fda779d3e991@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="260268"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: acm@muc.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 15:30:34 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVG8o-0015bM-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 15:30:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVG8m-0001AH-IU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:30:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45041) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVG7z-0001A5-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:29:44 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVG7y-0003dv-Sq; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:29:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1843 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iVG7y-0007u3-Ay; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:29:42 -0500 In-reply-to: <81e61ed6-27a3-dbdd-34fa-fda779d3e991@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:05:13 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242171 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:05:13 +0200 > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > The hope is that calling vertical-motion (or font-lock-ensure directly) > inside narrowing is a rare occasion Why do we need to have such hopes? The reality could be different, and I'd like us to support those different conditions. It doesn't sound like it's much harder.