From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41684: [PATCH] Highlight typed variables in python Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:15:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83blln4999.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200603115103.69611-1-Hi-Angel@yandex.ru> <83ftaz4dvd.fsf@gnu.org> <7711d0a2c41e4cb2c4d41527e608eed273221228.camel@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="93334"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41684@debbugs.gnu.org To: Konstantin Kharlamov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 13 11:16:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jk2Go-000OBV-5w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 11:16:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk2Gn-0006Ti-8K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk2Gg-0006Oe-JF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk2Gg-0001j9-A5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jk2Gg-0000Xu-5L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41684 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 41684-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41684.15920397402068 (code B ref 41684); Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41684) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2020 09:15:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40853 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jk2GK-0000XI-IP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:15:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jk2GI-0000X3-Uz for 41684@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk2GD-0001gs-Jw; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:15:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1826 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jk2G3-0000hG-8B; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:15:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7711d0a2c41e4cb2c4d41527e608eed273221228.camel@yandex.ru> (message from Konstantin Kharlamov on Sat, 13 Jun 2020 11:57:44 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181908 Archived-At: > From: Konstantin Kharlamov > Cc: 41684-done@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 11:57:44 +0300 > > > . it is better to submit patches in "git format-patch" format, as > > that makes it easier to apply the patch > > Hmm, okay… The patch was sent with git-send-email command, is it > different from git-format-patch? It isn't how you send the patches that's the issue, it's the way you produced the patch. AFAIK, git-send-email accepts patches formatted with git-format-patch, but it doesn't look like you used the latter to produce a patch.